Can a trust shelter company income for your children?
A friend told you that she avoided tax on dividends from her company shares by putting them in a trust for her children. Unfortunately, she was light on details of how this worked. Can avoiding tax as she described be that simple?

Parental gifts and tax
HMRC has long been aware of arrangements to divert income from parents to their children to avoid tax. It thwarts these with special anti-avoidance rules (the “settlements legislation”). This make a parent liable to tax on the diverted income if it exceeds £100. The rule applies in two situations:
- Where the parent keeps an interest in the income or assets generating the income, e.g. retaining ownership of property after giving the rights to the income to their minor child.
- Where a parent doesn’t have an interest in the assets they gifted and the income it generates is paid to their child.
Trusts and parental gifts
Situation 2 suggests that your friend might not be right. Dividends on shares she gifted to a trust will count as her taxable income when paid or treated as paid to her children. Most types of trust automatically give the beneficiary the right to income as soon as it is received even if the trustees hold it back from the beneficiary (child). A discretionary trust only gives the beneficiary the right to income when the trustees pay it to them. This means the settlements legislation won’t bite unless the trustees pay income to the child.
Discretionary trust
By giving shares in her company to a discretionary trust with her minor children as beneficiaries your friend won’t pay tax on the dividends generated by the shares. But that doesn’t mean no tax is paid. The trust has to pay tax on the dividends at a special rate equal to the higher income tax rate.
Your friend must not be a beneficiary or potential beneficiary of the trust as this counts as having an interest in the assets (shares) she gifted; and Situation 1 of the anti-avoidance rules will apply.
Tax frying pan or fire?
By using a discretionary trust it seems that your friend has simply swapped paying tax on the dividends herself for it being paid by the trust. However, the tax-saving plan is a slow burner. When the children reach 18, or if earlier marry or become a civil partner, the accumulated income (dividends) in the trust can be paid to them without counting as taxable income for your friend. Instead it’s taxable income for the now adult child. This might not appear to have achieved any tax saving, but if the adult child has no or only a small amount of income there’s a tax saving because they receive a refundable credit for the tax paid by the trust.
Example. Jacky is 18 and at university. She earned £1,500 working in the summer break. In 2022/23 she receives a payment of £5,000 before tax from a discretionary trust. It has already paid tax of £1,905 on the income (dividends). Jacky’s total income for 2022/23 is £6,500 which is less than the personal tax-free allowance. The £1,905 tax paid by the trust is treated as paid by Jacky. As she is not liable to tax she can reclaim the £1,905.
Conclusion
Tax can be saved by diverting income-producing assets to your children via a trust. It must be carefully worded to prevent anti-avoidance rules applying and will rely on your children having a period of low or no income after they reach 18. There are also capital tax consequences from gifting shares and we’ll look at these in another article.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?