Is a notional gain from exchange rate changes taxable?
The First-tier Tribunal has ruled on a case involving the sale of a holiday home in Switzerland. The dispute centred on how exchange rates affected the amount of gain taxable. Some important tax principles were covered in the ruling. What were they and how did they affect the outcome?

The facts
In 2006 Mr and Mrs Rawlings (R) purchased an apartment in Zermatt partly funded by a mortgage. They sold the property in 2016 and repaid the mortgage. R made a gain from the sale which they reported on their 2016/17 self-assessment returns. Their calculation reflected the change of exchange rates on purchase and sale values and also the mortgage amount. HMRC disagreed with the calculation, started an enquiry and issued an assessment to demand the additional tax it thought was due. R appealed to the First tier Tribunal (FTT).
Foreign exchange
The capital gains tax (CGT) rules require all gains or losses to be worked out in sterling. That’s to say that the purchase price of an asset must be converted to sterling at the time it was made and the sale price converted at the date it occurred. The effect is that fluctuations in exchange rates between the purchase and sale will increase or decrease the taxable amount of gain or loss. HMRC had no issues with the foreign exchange rate changes used by R except where they related to the mortgage repayment.
Mortgages and capital gains
HMRC argued that how R financed the purchase of their property had no bearing on the calculation of the gain, which is simply the difference between the purchase price plus expenses, e.g. legal and agents’ fees, and the sales price less expenses. However, R countered that the position was different for foreign assets because the exchange rate changes resulted in an extra cost and this should be deductible from the gain. This view doesn’t seem unreasonable. In their arguments R referred to HMRC’s advice on how to calculate capital gains and losses.
HMRC guidance
R directed the FTT to HMRC’s published guidance which says CGT is “a tax on the profit when you sell (or dispose of) something (an asset) at an increased value” . They stated that their “profit” was reduced because they had to pay more in sterling to clear the mortgage compared to the value of the mortgage in sterling when they took it out. This was an expense linked to the sale.
The FTT rules
In their ruling the FTT judges went to some length to set out and explain the problems with the tricky calculations submitted by R. We think this unnecessarily complicated the position but they may have done it to help R understand the logic of their decision, which was in favour of HMRC. While accepting that R had incurred an extra cost relating to the mortgage, the legislation precisely sets out what expenses are allowed to be deducted when working out the amount of a gain or loss. Mortgage costs are not an allowable expense and therefore any additional cost, e.g. exchange rate losses, linked to a mortgage are therefore also not deductible.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?