Mitigating the NI rise
The higher NI rates for 2022/23 will mean an employee on the average wage will pay around £230 per year more compared to 2021/22 and the employer will face a similar increase. How can they both legitimately reduce or avoid this extra cost?

NI rise confirmed
The government has committed to an across-the-board addition of 1.25% to NI rates from 6 April 2022. Based on the average UK wage of £31,000 per annum (according to the Office for National Statistics), the NI rate rise will cost employees and employers a total of almost an extra £600 per year.
Playing the percentages
In practice higher earners will be hit proportionately harder by the NI hike than the lower paid. For example, on an annual salary of £24,000 employees’ and employers’ NI bills will be 8% and 7.19% greater respectively. Whereas, for someone earning £80,000 per year the NI increases are 15.3% and 8.66%. While it seems fair that those who earn more should pay more, any increase in taxes is unwelcome no matter what the level of earnings is.
Dividends partial escape
To prevent director shareholders of companies escaping the NI rise by taking a greater part of their income as dividends (which are not liable to NI) in place of salary, the dividend tax rates have also been increased by 1.25%.
The dividend rate rise affects director shareholders but not their companies. This means that despite the government’s efforts there’s a saving to be made by reducing the salary (where it would be liable to NI) and increasing dividends by a corresponding amount. For example, swapping £10,000 of salary for £10,000 of dividends means the company avoids NI of £1,505 which far outweighs the increase in NI.
Savings for employers
While companies can pay dividends to their director shareholders instead of salary to escape part of the rise, that option isn’t open to their employees who don’t own shares in the company. The good news is that there’s an alternative which can allow many employees and their employers to mitigate the NI increase.
Salary sacrifice (HMRC calls them optional remuneration arrangements (OpRAs)) can reduce NI costs for employees and employers. An OpRA involves an employee giving up some of their salary in exchange for a benefit in kind. While the scope for these was severely curtailed in 2017, there’s still room for a successful OpRA.
Limited scope for OpRAs
Anti-avoidance rules block most tax and NI advantages of OpRAs but several remain, e.g. cycle to work schemes and pension contributions. The latter is especially useful as auto-enrolment means that many employees contribute to their employer’s workplace pension scheme.
Using a firm’s workplace pension scheme, an OpRA can be tailored to reduce or in some cases eliminate the extra NI costs for employees and employers. In broad terms, it involves the employees reducing the salaries they use to pay their workplace pension contributions which the employer then pays instead.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?