Saving IHT on the family home
A husband left the whole of his estate, mainly consisting of his share in a home, to his wife in his will. As a result there will be a big inheritance tax bill waiting when she dies. What steps can the wife and their children take to reduce it?

Frozen nil rate bands
While the inheritance tax (IHT) nil rate bands (NRBs) look generous, rising property values are increasing the chances of a hefty IHT bill. Currently, if an estate is worth more than £325,000, IHT at 40% is payable on the excess. Plus, there’s an additional NRB of £175,000 where an estate includes a property (or value derived from a property) which was the deceased’s home. For estates worth more which include a residential property further planning is possible to reduce IHT.
Tax-saving tactics
Basic IHT planning involves making gifts out of an estate and surviving at least four years, but ideally seven as the gift then escapes IHT. This tactic isn’t easy to put into practice if a large part of the estate’s value is tied up in the individual’s home. One option is to downsize to release cash to give away. However, where moving home isn’t suitable there are alternatives but these require care if the anti-avoidance rules are to consider.
GROB rules
The gift with reservation of benefit (GROB) anti-avoidance rules mean that if someone gives away an asset but continue to use or obtain a benefit from it, it remains part of their estate for IHT purposes. For example, if a parent transferred ownership of their home to a child and continued to live in it. Only when they cease to do so will it count as a gift for IHT purposes
The GROB rules don’t apply if the transferor pays the transferee rent (at the market rate) for use of the asset they gave away. This can work especially well as an IHT-saving mechanism because the rent the transferor pays also reduces their estate without the seven-year wait.
The problem with this is that the rent is taxable income for the recipient. If they pay tax at basic rate (20%) or less this type of gift and rent arrangement still saves tax overall but is less effective than a plan which avoids tax altogether. Additionally, the rent must be reviewed regularly to ensure a market rate continues to be paid.
An alternative arrangement is for the owner to give away a share of the property and for the transferee to occupy the property with them. The running costs of the property must also be shared. Moving in with an elderly relative might seem like a drastic move but saving tens of thousands in IHT is a powerful motivator. In any case, a full relocation isn’t necessary.
Relaxed living arrangements
The transferor and transferee don’t need to live in each other’s pockets. There only needs to be some shared occupation. For example, the home could be divided into different living areas so that the transferee and transferor could largely live apart.
If the property is large enough to be divided into two separate residences and the transferor only occupies one, this would allow them to give away the other residence without the GROB rules applying. However, if they visited the other residence, say because they gave it to a relative, the amount of time spent in the property must be minimal or HMRC might argue that the GROB rules apply.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?